Upcoming Events

Tuesday August 31 (Sydney): I will be presenting some preliminary results from the Using Expertise project at the NSW KM Forum. This is an (almost) free event and also features Gail McGuckin – who I have never met but heard many good things about.

Friday October 8 & Saturday October 9 (Sydney): I will be running a session called Welcome to the Jungle at Oz-IA. I attended and presented at this last year and thoroughly enjoyed it. Organizer Eric Scheid does his best to make the whole conference experience memorable.

Monday 18 October & Tuesday 19 October (Canberra): I will be at the annual actKM conference running an interactive session around Performance Enhancing. This is one of my favourite conferences ev-ah – not least because experimentation is warmly welcomed.

Wednesday 20 October (Canberra): I will be joining Nerida Hart & Siwan Lovett from the Australian River Restoration Centre (ARRC) in a workshop on narrative-based facilitation techniques. More to follow soon.

Monday 29 & Tuesday 30 November (Brisbane): I will probably be doing something at ACKMIDS around the divide between practitioners and academics in knowledge management. To be confirmed.

Posted in Presentations & Events | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

OzCollab Article in Image & Data Manager

The results of the OzCollab Survey have appeared in Image & Data Manager in an article co-written with Keith De La Rue.

In June 2009, we set out to assess the state of play in the collaborative software market in Australia. We wanted to get behind the hype of the “collaboration” buzz-word to discover how organisations are selecting and implementing these tools, and whether they are benefiting from them.

Posted in Articles & Papers | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Paperless Office – Future Tense – ABC Radio National

A few months ago, I contributed to an edition of Future Tense on the paperless office with Richard Watson. The major problem with the session was that Richard & I agreed on too much. I think we were both trying to be sensible and balanced which is all very grown up but makes for boring radio.

One idea that I wimped out of expounding suggested that the paperless office fad was the most populist and business-oriented version of a form of gnosticism that erupted in the 1990s. The wackier versions include Ray Kurzweil and the Extropians (the writings of Erik Davis provide an interesting commentary). Basically the material world is considered evil and something to be escaped. As my comments in the show indicate, I don’t think we can escape our materiality – “we are living in a material world” as someone once sang…

Audio and transcript here.

Posted in Media | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

User Generated Learning

About a month ago, I gave a webcast presentation to the eLearning Guild on User Generated Learning. Despite the 5 am in Sydney time slot, it was actually a lot of fun. The 40-odd participants were not shy of contributing

I was unhappy with my original article and wanted another chance to pull together my thoughts on this topic.

The first half states the obvious – the cost of producing and distributing many kinds of media has dropped significantly in the last decade.  This means that, in theory, everyone could be an instructional designer – i.e. a creator of artifacts or events that help others learn.

Now, in practice, instructional designers are not out of job but I think that job will change. Which is where the second (and far more interesting) half of the session gets busy. What will instructional designers be doing? I suggested four areas:

  1. Coaching people on the best way to use these new tools with Powerpoint as an example of how not to do it.
  2. Maintaining quality.
  3. Curating and ensuring that people can find what they and others produce.
  4. Innovating and developing new learning format and techniques – e.g. serious games.
Posted in Presentations & Events | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Performance Enhancing @ SOL Australia

Many thanks to those who came to the session yesterday.  The word association results are available for download. Some slight tweaking of the order of results: (p.1 “Future Challenges”, p.1 refers to “Training & Development”, p.3  “Knowledge Management”, p.4 “Organizational Learning”, p.5 “Performance Improvement”).

Got more of a chance to dig into the maturity model, which I think is fundamentally sound. One important point that cropped up was around “culture”. Now I have largely steered clear of that term – because it is so horrendously over-used, it’s lost a lot of its meaning. I also don’t think that a learning & knowledge person can “implement” culture – they can only influence it. So in the book, I talk about different kinds of cultural indicators you tend to see at different levels of maturity.

The other important point that came through in the word association exercise was the fuzziness of the different traditions that I talk about. They intermingle with each. So the best I can aim for in the space I have allotted myself (& I suspect readers will willingly absorb) is a caricature rather than a full portrait.

Posted in Presentations & Events | Tagged | 1 Comment

Digital Citizens – Personality & Disclosure

I may be talking at Digital Citizens next week. I say may because they have some good speakers & I talk too much anyway. However there are three issues about personality, privacy, identity, disclosure & all that gubbins that I want note down here regardless.

1. The Larry David Problem

About 18 months ago, I did a session with some public servants where I gave them some hypothetical social software situations and asked them what they would do. What struck me about their responses (esp. to the first situation) was the sheer diversity. Everything from “institute disciplinary action against my staffer” to “tell the complainer to go **** themselves”. Now some of you will nod and say “this is simply reinforces the need for a clear social media policy”. Well yes, but this assumes that there is a consensus concerning what is good & bad in terms of online behaviour.

Which brings me to the gentleman on the left. As anyone who has watched Curb Your Enthusiasm will know, much of the humour arises because Larry and the people he meets in his life disagree over what is acceptable and unacceptable behaviour. Is it acceptable to try more than 10 flavors of ice cream in the shop? Is it OK to call a man a c***? What do you do if your housekeeper can’t keep her chest in check? How do you react if someone gives your wife a bra as a present? How much caviar can you eat at a party? We live in a diverse , dynamic society so we cannot rely on tacit norms. The internet increases the diversity of the people we can meet & interactive with. On the one hand, this is great. Our lives are much richer because of it. But on the other, we are presented with more opportunities for misunderstanding.  How much should we each disclose online? What is acceptable behaviour? And above all, who gets to choose?

2. Jugglers

Now some of you will already have an answer to question 1. “Online behaviour should be covered by the contract you have with your employer”. Well, yes, but when is someone working and when are they off duty? We all have to juggle multiple roles and identities in our lives. As I write this, I am keeping an eye on my young son (whose motor skills development is both a joy and a worry). I am trying to juggle blogging and fatherhood. I suspect this juggling of our identities is becoming more complicated and conflicted, rather than less. Our relationships with our employers have become ever more intense (and frankly sadomasochistic). “Yes of course you can have a promotion/time off but you must keep this mobile device switched on 24/7”. As more balls get added, the more likely we are to drop one. It’s always been a handy myth that we only have one identity. Social software doesn’t change that, it simply makes it more visible. Who exactly am I talking to? Who are you right now?

3. The Four Panes

The item on the right is called a Johari Window. It’s a simple way of framing how identity and reputation operate. Much of the discussion about personality and disclosure has focused on what people choose to move from “Hidden” to “Public”, which is an important discussion to have but not the only one possible. The internet can also be seen as a great tool for self discovery – if you have many other people watching and commenting then what opportunities do you have for discovering your blind spots? What opportunities do you have for exploring your unconscious? I’d like to ask Marcus Brown that, if  he ever gets off the toilet*.

Most conversations about personality and disclosure tend to focus on the risks, the downsides. What are the upsides? What do these new communications technologies allow us to do that we haven’t done before?

My only beef with the Johari Window is that its nice, regular, square shape does not adequately represent our messy, multiple, changeable personalities. It should look more like a weird, pulsing blob.

*Whenever I sit on the toilet for too long, I get pins and needles in my legs. I try to stand up and then fall over. Ooops – was that too much disclosure?

Posted in Presentations & Events | Tagged | 1 Comment

“Performance Enhancing” @ ISPI Sydney

Some of the ideas in the book got their first outing last night with the Sydney Chapter of ISPI. To be honest, I had a massive pile of content sitting behind the slides but we really only got as far as the first few exercise. The results of the word association & challenge request are available to download (p.1-2 refers to “Training & Development”, p.3-4  “Knowledge Management”, p.5-6 “Organizational Learning”, p.7-8 “Performance Improvement”, p.9 “Future Challenges”).

Some key things for me:

  • People’s comments generally reinforced my own feelings about topics – but there was a wide range of opinion. This led to some very fruitful discussions but was a reminder for me to stake out my own positions as clearly as possible in the book and not assume a common point of view.
  • Some unexpected comments on knowledge sharing & age (i.e. are Gen X managers more likely to hoard what they know?)
  • Little awareness of the theory behind different practice areas (esp. for organizational learning).
  • Exactly what the maturity model is a maturity model of needs to be clearer in my mind.

There were a smart bunch of people present & many thanks to John Loty for giving me the slot.

Posted in Presentations & Events | Tagged | 1 Comment

Enterprise Collaborative Bookmarking

I wrote this article at the end of last year for Online Currents. If you are aware of any other products or case studies than those mentioned then please leave a comment below or drop me an email. Many thanks to Sanjeev Sisodiya, Dheeraj Chowdhury & Meredith Hannon for their help.

Games of tag: The rise and disappearance of enterprise collaborative bookmarking

Social bookmarking sites such as delicious have arisen on the internet. Enterprises have been experimenting with open source and commercial versions of such tools within – and sometimes across – their firewalls. This article begins with an overview of social bookmarking and folksonomies. It then explores 2 case studies (MITRE Corporation in the US and DET NSW here in Australia) and 2 vendor offerings (Connectbeam and IBM Lotus Connections). It ends with some conclusions on the future of enterprise collaborative bookmarking and some advice for those wishing to engage in it.

Posted in Articles & Papers | Tagged , , , , | 6 Comments

Reflections on BarCamp Canberra 2010

Last weekend I spent some highly enjoyable day at BarCamp Canberra 2010. I arrived early & was a little greedy with sessions – scooping up 3 of them (I think I will limit myself to 2 in future). The sessions were recorded.

  • The first session was a high-speed small-group discussion that had its roots in the Wicked paper.
  • The second dealt with the cyborg metadata concept (though it got a little detoured into condorcet voting) that will get further worked through in some articles that will come out over the course of this year.
  • The final session talked about ‘sexy software’ and the results of the OzCollab survey.

Aside from my stuff, I was in sessions by James Dellow, Ruth Ellison, Stephen Collins, Craig Tomler and the totally awesome Open Australia crew. The Haiti work from Open Street Map and Andrew Blanda’s Riding for a Cause also deserve a big mention.

Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. but it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning. Winston Churchill.

Obviously Government 2.0 (whatever the hell that is) was a hot topic. Kate Lundy & Pia Waugh were in the house. My feeling is that the hype cycle in Australia for this thing peaked at the end of last year with end of the Taskforce. Things will go quiet for a bit – on the surface. Under the surface (like a swimmer kicking furiously) there will be lots of activity. And then we’ll start to see lots of new, cool stuff towards the end of this year.

Many thanks to the (un)organizers for their hard work and the participants for their energy.

Posted in Presentations & Events | Tagged , | Leave a comment